"Greenland is Not For Sale": Europe Warns Trump as US Eyes World's Largest Island

 

By Today Latest News Update India | January 13, 2026

​Editor’s Note: Following reports of renewed US interest in purchasing Greenland, European nations have formed a united front. This report analyzes the strong refusal from the "Weimar Triangle" and what it means for Trans-Atlantic relations.

​Trump Wants Greenland? Europe Says "NO"

​In a surprising geopolitical turn, the issue of Greenland—the world's largest island—has once again sparked tension between the United States and Europe. Reports indicate that US President Donald Trump has expressed interest in "purchasing" the territory, a move that has been met with fierce resistance from European leaders.

​1. "Not For Sale": The Weimar Triangle Speaks

​While diplomatic attention was focused on the visit of India's External Affairs Minister to Europe, a crucial meeting of the Weimar Triangle (comprising France, Germany, and Poland) addressed the Greenland issue head-on.

• ​The Verdict: The three European powerhouses sent a clear message to Washington: Greenland is a sovereign territory within the Kingdom of Denmark and is "not for sale."
• ​Unified Front: Unlike previous years, the European Union stands united in defending Greenland's sovereignty, ruling out any possibility of a transactional deal involving the island.

​2. Why Does the US Want Greenland?

​Geopolitical analysts suggest several reasons for Washington's interest:

• ​Strategic Location: Greenland sits between the Arctic and the Atlantic, making it critical for military surveillance and missile defense.
• ​Resource Rich: The island holds vast untapped reserves of rare earth minerals, oil, and natural gas, which are essential for future technologies.

​3. US "Turning Away" from Allies?

​French President Emmanuel Macron used this opportunity to warn that the US is increasingly acting unilaterally. By treating sovereign territories as real estate, critics argue that the "America First" policy is alienating traditional NATO allies.

​Conclusion

​The Greenland dispute highlights a widening gap between US ambitions and European values. With the Weimar Triangle firmly drawing a red line, the message is clear: Territories and people are not commodities to be traded in the 21st century.